Registrera dig | Logga in | FAQ      [?] 
Recent | Unread | Search | Authors | Tags | Export

amarois' evaluation [15 articles]

Senaste hänvisningarna i amarois' bibliotek insorterade under taggen evaluation. You can also see everyone's evaluation.
  • Does the h-index for ranking of scientists really work?
    Scientometrics, Vol. 65, No. 3. (December 2005), pp. 391-392.
    by Lutz Bornmann, Hans-Dieter Daniel
    posted to academic evaluation h-index by amarois on 2007-12-02 15:08:30 as ** along with 2 people sergut JSicot
  • Impact factors: uses and abuses.
    Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol, Vol. 14, No. 3. (March 2002), pp. 209-211.
    posted to bibliometrie evaluation impactfactor by amarois on 2007-12-01 15:29:18 as **
  • Journal impact factor: a brief review.
    CMAJ, Vol. 161, No. 8. (19 October 1999), pp. 979-980.
    posted to bibliometrie citation evaluation impactfactor by amarois on 2007-12-01 15:25:22 as **
  • The "impact factor" revisited
    Biomedical Digital Libraries, Vol. 2, No. 1. (05 December 2005), 7.
    by Peng Dong, Marie Loh, Adrian Mondry
  • notes Évaluation et validation de l’information sur internet
    BBF, No. 4. (2007), pp. 96-97.
    by Agnès Saxcé
    posted to evaluation folksonomy informationliteracy by amarois on 2007-07-27 08:51:35 as **
  • notes Open Access : Comment concilier la qualité et la quantité ?
    BBF, No. 4. (2007), pp. 100-101.
    by Nicolas Hubert
    posted to economie evaluation openaccess openachive by amarois on 2007-07-27 08:38:05 as read
  • Online or Invisible?
    Nature, Vol. 411, No. 6837. (2001)
    posted to evaluation openaccess by amarois on 2007-04-18 17:24:08 as **
  • The Invisible Hand of Peer Review
    (2000)
    by S Harnad
    posted to evaluation by amarois on 2007-04-18 16:44:03 as **
  • L'hypertexte comme mode d'exploitation des résultats d'outils et méthodes d'analyse de l'information scientifique et technique
    (2000)
    by Luc Grivel, Luc Quoniam
    posted to citation evaluation veille by amarois on 2007-04-15 15:41:40 as ***
  • For Whom the Gate Tolls? How and Why to Free the Refereed Research Literature Online Through Author/Institution Self-Archiving, Now.
    (2001)
    by Stevan Harnad
    posted to evaluation openaccess by amarois on 2007-04-13 16:09:08 as **
  • Vers une remise en question des modalités traditionnelles d'évaluation des savoirs scientifiques ?
    (April 2006)
    by Muriel Lefebvre
    posted to evaluation by amarois on 2007-04-05 10:37:59 as **
  • Quelle bibliométrie, pour quelle évaluation - Dossier
    La lettre des neurosciences, No. 30. (2006), pp. 7-18.
    edited by S Cnr
    posted to citation evaluation by amarois on 2007-03-22 16:43:06 as read
  • Toward alternative metrics of journal impact: A comparison of download and citation data
    Information Processing & Management, Vol. 41, No. 6. (December 2005), pp. 1419-1440.
    by Johan Bollen, Herbert Van de Sompel, Joan A Smith, Rick Luce
  • L'évaluation des publications scientifiques : du facteur d'impact à l'indice de notoriété
    archivesic. (26 October 2006)
    posted to citation evaluation recherche by amarois on 2007-03-15 14:13:22 as ****
  • An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output
    PNAS, Vol. 102, No. 46. (15 November 2005), pp. 16569-16572.
    by JE Hirsch
  • Du kan hänvisa till den här sidan som: http://www.citeulike.org/user/amarois/tag/evaluation

    RIS BibTeX
    CiteULike organises scholarly (or academic) papers or literature and provides bibliographic (which means it makes bibliographies) for universities and higher education establishments. It helps undergraduates and postgraduates. People studying for PhDs or in postdoctoral (postdoc) positions. The service is similar in scope to EndNote or RefWorks or any other reference manager like BibTeX, but it is a social bookmarking service for scientists and humanities researchers.