Registrera dig | Logga in | FAQ      [?] 
Recent | Unread | Search | Authors | Tags | Export

CGREALDisclosures library [33 articles]

Senaste artiklarna i CGREALDisclosures bibliotek.
  • Ethical issues in the collection, storage, and research use of human biological materials.
    J Lab Clin Med, Vol. 144, No. 5. (November 2004)
    by EM Meslin, KA Quaid
  • Genetic testing and human subjects in research.
    Whittier Law Rev, Vol. 24, No. 2. (2002), pp. 429-472.
    by SA Laidlaw, LJ Raffel, JF Daar
  • Protecting communities in research: current guidelines and limits of extrapolation.
    Nat Genet, Vol. 23, No. 3. (November 1999), pp. 275-280.
    by C Weijer, G Goldsand, EJ Emanuel
  • Unexpected findings in identifiable stored blood samples after analysis without consent: moral arguments for and against disclosure.
    Genet Couns, Vol. 13, No. 2. (2002), pp. 115-121.
    by MF Verweij, BC Hamel
  • The duty to recontact: benefit and harm.
    Am J Hum Genet, Vol. 65, No. 4. (October 1999), pp. 1201-1204.
    by NF Sharpe
  • Ethical issues in genetic research: disclosure and informed consent.
    Nat Genet, Vol. 15, No. 1. (January 1997), pp. 16-20.
    by PR Reilly, MF Boshar, SH Holtzman
  • Disclosure of Genetic Information Obtained Through Research
    Genetic Testing, Vol. 8, No. 3., 347.
    by Kimberly A Quaid, Nenette M Jessup, Eric M Meslin
    posted to disclosure-research-results by CGREALDisclosure on 2005-07-11 20:57:26 as ** along with 1 group CGREL
  • Concern for families and individuals in clinical genetics.
    J Med Ethics, Vol. 29, No. 2. (April 2003), pp. 70-73.
  • Staying informed and recontacting patients about research advances: a study of patient attitudes.
    Am J Hum Genet, Vol. 59, No. 4. (October 1996)
    by M Huggins, C Hahn, T Costa
  • Duty to re-contact.
    Genet Med, Vol. 1, No. 4. (n 1999), pp. 171-172.
  • Balancing autonomy and responsibility: the ethics of generating and disclosing genetic information.
    J Med Ethics, Vol. 29, No. 2. (April 2003)
  • Genetic test results and the duty to disclose: can medical researchers control liability?
    Seattle Univ Law Rev, Vol. 23, No. 2. (1999), pp. 391-429.
    by RL Furman
  • A model agreement for genetic research in socially identifiable populations.
    Am J Hum Genet, Vol. 63, No. 3. (September 1998), pp. 696-702.
    by MW Foster, D Bernsten, TH Carter
  • Disseminating the results of participant-focused research.
    J Transcult Nurs, Vol. 10, No. 4. (October 1999), pp. 340-349.
  • Duty to warn at-risk relatives for genetic disease: Genetic counselors' clinical experience
    American Journal of Medical Genetics Part C: Seminars in Medical Genetics, Vol. 119C, No. 1. (17 December 2002), pp. 27-34.
    by Beth B Dugan, Georgia L Wiesner, Eric T Juengst, Maryann O'Riordan, Anne L Matthews, Nathaniel H Robin
  • The duty to recontact: attitudes of genetics service providers.
    Am J Hum Genet, Vol. 61, No. 4. (October 1997)
  • Considerations and costs of disclosing study findings to research participants.
    CMAJ, Vol. 170, No. 9. (27 April 2004), pp. 1417-1419.
  • What must research subjects be told regarding the results of completed randomized trials?
    IRB, Vol. 26, No. 3. (n 2004), pp. 8-10.
    by M Markman
  • Informing study participants of research results: an ethical imperative.
    IRB, Vol. 25, No. 3. (n 2003), pp. 12-19.
    by CV Fernandez, E Kodish, C Weijer
  • Misusing informed consent: a critique of limitations on research subjects' access to genetic research results.
    Sask Law Rev, Vol. 63, No. 2. (2000), pp. 539-580.
    by TM Banks
  • Expanding the physician's duty of care: a duty to recontact?
    Med Law, Vol. 23, No. 3. (2004), pp. 531-539.
  • Ethical, legal, and practical concerns about recontacting patients to inform them of new information: the case in medical genetics.
    Am J Med Genet, Vol. 103, No. 4. (1 November 2001), pp. 265-276.
    by AG Hunter, N Sharpe, M Mullen, WS Meschino
  • Duty to disclose in medical genetics: a legal perspective.
    Am J Med Genet, Vol. 39, No. 3. (1 June 1991), pp. 347-354.
    by MZ Pelias
  • The duty to recontact: attitudes of genetics service providers.
    Am J Hum Genet, Vol. 64, No. 3. (March 1999), pp. 852-860.
    by JL Fitzpatrick, C Hahn, T Costa, MJ Huggins
  • Medical Geneticists' duty to warn at-risk relatives for genetic disease.
    Am J Med Genet A, Vol. 120, No. 3. (30 July 2003), pp. 374-380.
    by MJ Falk, RB Dugan, MA O'Riordan, AL Matthews, NH Robin
  • The "duty to warn" a patient's family members about hereditary disease risks.
    JAMA, Vol. 292, No. 12. (22 September 2004), pp. 1469-1473.
    by K Offit, E Groeger, S Turner, EA Wadsworth, MA Weiser
  • A physician's duty to warn family members of genetic risks: limiting the importance of Tarasoff.
    J Biolaw Bus, Vol. 6, No. 1. (2003), pp. 28-38.
    by S Russell
  • Disclosure of familial genetic information: perceptions of the duty to inform.
    Am J Med, Vol. 109, No. 9. (15 December 2000), pp. 705-711.
    by LS Lehmann, JC Weeks, N Klar, L Biener, JE Garber
  • On warning families about genetic risk: the ghost of Tarasoff.
    Am J Med, Vol. 109, No. 9. (15 December 2000), pp. 738-739.
    by DP Sulmasy
  • Privacy and disclosure in medical genetics examined in an ethics of care.
    Bioethics, Vol. 5, No. 3. (July 1991), pp. 212-232.
    by DC Wertz, JC Fletcher
  • When should an investigator share raw data with the subjects?
    IRB, Vol. 2, No. 9. (November 1980)
    by P Reilly
  • Informed consent for population-based research involving genetics.
    JAMA, Vol. 286, No. 18. (14 November 2001), pp. 2315-2321.
    by LM Beskow, W Burke, JF Merz, PA Barr, S Terry, VB Penchaszadeh, LO Gostin, M Gwinn, MJ Khoury
  • Genetic research involving human biological materials: a need to tailor current consent forms.
    IRB, Vol. 26, No. 3. (n 2004), pp. 1-7.
  • Du kan hänvisa till den här sidan som: http://www.citeulike.org/user/CGREALDisclosure

    RIS BibTeX
    CiteULike organises scholarly (or academic) papers or literature and provides bibliographic (which means it makes bibliographies) for universities and higher education establishments. It helps undergraduates and postgraduates. People studying for PhDs or in postdoctoral (postdoc) positions. The service is similar in scope to EndNote or RefWorks or any other reference manager like BibTeX, but it is a social bookmarking service for scientists and humanities researchers.